Nike case study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Nike - Case Study Example Therefore, Nike ought to compel these companies to conform to the already set guidelines meant to protect workers in their respective states. These include both international and national rights usually put in place to safeguard human rights by availing conducive working conditions for workers in states where these companies belong. In addition, Nike Company based on the fact it funds all its subcontracting manufacturing factories, it should be responsible for any act infringing of human rights as outlined by varied states’ constitutions and international law. 2. What labor standards regarding safety, working conditions, overtime, and the like, should Nike hold foreign factories to? Nike ought to implement specific safety standards and humanitarian working conditions in all subcontracted factories globally with the intention of avoiding losing its reputation. This is because for several decades Nike Company has experienced bad publicity due to numerous accusations lodged again st it by trade unions, global regimes and University students based on poor working conditions. Numerous economic experts claim creation of Nike’s wealth is through enslaving poor people especially in developing countries. This is evident when Connor cites Nike Company is a rich Western corporation whose main objective is to provide expensive shoes to the well off people in developed countries while in turn exploiting the less privileged. Nike ought to ensure transparency and accountability in various factories, which it has entered into contract with in quest to market its products globally. In addition, its management ought to encourage workers in airing their grievances without victimization to their respective supervisors and managers (Lichtig & Wisley, n.d). This is by the enforcing adherence of laws in all its factories in order to avail adequate and effective protective equipments especially to workers working in departments dealing with obnoxious chemicals. Some of th ese protective facilities include gloves, masks, industrial boots as well as overall coats, which are vital in avoiding lethal complications caused by uncontrolled exposure to chemicals in the factories. Besides, Nike Company ought to compel its factories to implement both minimum wage and working duration policies stipulated by regimes of varied states in which they operate (Lichtig & Wisley, n.d). 3. In Indonesia, an income of $2.28 a day, the base pay of Nike factory workers, is double the daily income of about half the working population. Half of all adults in Indonesia are farmers, who receive less than $1 a day. Given these national standards, is it appropriate to criticize Nike for the low pay rates of its subcontractors in Indonesia? Yes. Nike Company deserves criticism it currently receives from all global quarters due to poor wages, which almost all its factories situated beyond US borders pays their workers. I think Nike should not pay its workers based on what majority o f casual workers and farmers in Indonesia usually receive. Therefore, it is ethical that Nike and all its subcontracted factories pay their workers decently to enable people live comfortably besides motivating them. In addition, Indonesia being the highest producer of Nike products, its workers ought to receive special privileges as a sign of the mainstream’